Canadian surgeon FIRED for voicing safety concerns over Covid jabs for Children
Dr Francis Christian, practising surgeon and clinical professor of general surgery at the University of Saskatchewan, has been immediately suspended from all teaching and will be permanently removed from his role as of September.
Dr Christian has been a surgeon for more than 20 years and began working in Saskatoon in 2007. He was appointed Director of the Surgical Humanities Program and Director of Quality and Patient Safety in 2018 and co-founded the Surgical Humanities Program. Dr. Christian is also the Editor of the Journal of The Surgical Humanities.
On June 17th Dr Christian released a statement to over 200 of his colleagues, expressing concern over the lack of informed consent involved in Canada’s “Covid19 vaccination” program, especially regarding children.
To be clear, Dr Christian’s position is hardly an extreme one.
He believes the virus is real, he believes in vaccination as a general principle, he believes the elderly and vulnerable may benefit from the Covid “vaccine”…he simply doesn’t agree it should be used on children, and feels parents are not being given enough information for properly informed consent.
Interestingly, even the World Health Organization partially endorses this position, since April their website on vaccination has read:
Children should not be vaccinated for the moment. There is not yet enough evidence on the use of vaccines against COVID-19 in children to make recommendations for children to be vaccinated against COVID-19.
That was not enough to save Dr Christian. That is how frighteningly intolerant of diversity of opinion the mainstream – and especially academia – has become.
On June 23rd Dr Christian was called into a Zoom meeting with other senior members of the faculty and representatives of the Saskatchewan public health authority. In this meeting he was informed of his immediate suspension and upcoming termination.
The most disturbing aspect of the situation is the way the other people present, most especially Dr Susan Shaw, are trying to position themselves as concerned for Dr Christian’s mental health. It is gaslighting in its purest form, and reminiscent of the worst kind of totalitarian societies.
Health care employees and many other Americans are experiencing pressure to accept vaccination or be fired. For example, a hospital in Texas has made vaccination a condition of employment. I can understand the reluctance of a nurse or doctor, who has witnessed severe injury and death to those who were vaccinated, being unwilling to subject themselves to the risk. They have exposed themselves for 16 months to risk of infection by treating those who are infected. Now they are declared to be a risk to patients because they are not vaccinated and are pressured to accept the high risk of injury from the vaccine.
David Ramsey offers advice to one nurse:
Notice how quickly American corporations have taken to the idea that they have the right to make deeply personal decisions for employees. It is no longer just US presidents, such as Bush and Obama, who claim authority to set aside our constitutional protections and throw us in prison and execute us without due process, private profit-making corporations are now asserting the right to make our personal decisions.
What does this tell us about the belief in freedom in America? It tells us that it is the last thing public and private leaders think about. Freedom? What is that? The right to disagree with the government, the boss, the media? That’s terrorism. That’s conspiracy theory. That’s being uncooperative. Take off the tinfoil hat and do as you are told.
This is what everyone who works for a US corporation experiences. Take the vaccine. Don’t use these pronouns. Go to sensitivity training. Submit! Submit! Submit!
That is America today. Notice how quickly it came on us. Compare today with 16 months ago and observe the rapid erosion of freedom.
During the 20th century Cold War, Americans heard about “captive nations.” Today America is a captive nation.
Employers’ demands that employees submit to vaccination are not merely assertions of authority over personal decisions and violations of freedom. A lot of evidence indicates that vaccination mandates endanger people’s lives. Much evidence indicates a high incidence of death and serious injury associated with Covid vaccination and that the vaccine itself is causing the variants. See below for one such warning.
The scientific evidence should be publicly debated. Instead, the evidence is suppressed. If the evidence is mistaken, it should be easy to show that to be the case. So why is it suppressed instead of examined and debated? How can it be that corporate executives and boards can be ignorant of the dangers to which they demand employees subject themselves?
Is this a plot against life as people increasingly believe, or is it just stupidity and incompetence on the part of those in leadership positions. Neither answer is reassuring.
Dr. Peter McCullough provides one of the many unambiguous warnings issued by highly qualified experts, people far more knowledgeable than Tony Fauci, a medical bureaucrat whose lifetime work has been to maximize the profits of the pharmaceutical industry.
Dr. McCullough is Vice Chief of Internal Medicine at Baylor University, editor of Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, senior editor of the American Journal of Cardiology, editor of the textbook Cardiorenal Medicine, and president of the Cardiorenal Society.
“The first wave of the bioterrorism was a respiratory virus that spread across the world, and affected relatively few people—about one percent of many populations—but generated great fear,” McCullough explained during the Oval Media webinar with other doctors. He noted that the virus targeted “mostly the frail and the elderly, but for otherwise well people, it was much like having the common cold.”
Dr. McCullough has treated many patients with the disease, written papers on it, had the disease himself, and has also seen a death in his own family due to COVID.
He believes that fear of the virus was used very quickly to generate policies that would hugely impact human life, such as the draconian lockdowns. “Every single thing that was done in public health in response to the pandemic made it worse,” he pointed out.
McCullough explained that early on, as a doctor treating COVID patients, he came up with an early treatment regimen for those struck with the virus, which reduced hospital stays by about 85 percent, and said he began publishing papers on what he had learned. The doctor noted that he was “met with resistance at all levels” in terms of actually treating patients and publishing his papers.
“Fortunately I had enough publication strength to publish the only two papers in the entire medical literature that teaches doctors how to treat COVID-19 patients at home to prevent hospitalization,” he said. “What we have discovered is that the suppression of early treatment was tightly linked to the development of a vaccine, and the entire program—and in a sense, bioterrorism phase one— was rolled out, and was really about keeping the population in fear, and in isolation preparing them to accept the vaccine, which appears to be phase two of a bioterrorism operation.” McCullough explained that both the coronavirus and the vaccines deliver “to the human body, the spike protein, which is the gain of function target of this bioterrorism research.”
He acknowledged that he couldn’t come out and say this on national television because the medical establishment has done such a thorough job of propagandizing the issue. “What we have learned over time is that we could no longer communicate with government agencies. We actually couldn’t communicate with our propagandized colleagues in major medical centers, all of which appear to be under a spell, almost as if they’ve been hypnotized.” “Good doctors are doing unthinkable things like injecting biologically active messenger RNA that produces this pathogenic spike protein into pregnant women. I think when these doctors wake up from their trance, they’re going to be shocked to think what they’ve done to people,” he said, echoing what he, and Dr. Harvey Risch, professor at the Yale School of Public Health, told Fox News host Laura Ingraham during an interview last month.
Last summer McCullolugh started an early treatment initiative to keep COVID patients out of the hospital, which involved organizing multiple groups of medical doctors in the United States and abroad. The doctor noted that some governments tried to block these doctors from providing the treatments, but with the help of the Association of Physicians and Surgeons, they were able to put out a home patient guide, and in the U.S., organized four different tele-medical services, and fifteen regional tele-medical services. This way, people who were stricken with COVID-19, were able to call in to these services and get the medications they needed prescribed to local pharmacies, or mail order distribution pharmacies, he explained. “Without the government really even understanding what was going on, we crushed the epidemic curve of the United States,” McCullough claimed. “Toward the end of December and January, we basically took care of the pandemic with about 500 doctors and telemedicine services, and to this day, we treat about 25 percent of the U.S. COVID-19 population that are actually at high risk, over age 50 with medical problems that present with severe symptoms.”
“We know that this is phase two of bioterrorism, we don’t know who’s behind it, but we know that they want a needle in every arm to inject messenger RNA, or adenoviral DNA into every human being,” he said. “They want every human being.” The doctor later warned that the experimental vaccines could ultimately lead to cancers, and sterilize young women. Dr. McCullough said his goal is to set apart a large group of people that the system cannot get to, which would include those who have already had the virus, those with immunity, children, pregnant women, and child-bearing women. The cardiologist went on to say that because there is no clinical benefit in young people whatsoever to get the vaccine, even one case of myocarditis or pericarditis following the shots “is too many,” yet even though the CDC is aware of hundreds of alarming reports of cases of heart swelling in teenagers and young adults, they’re only going to reevaluate the matter later on in June. He accused the medical establishment of neglecting to to do anything to reduce the risks of the vaccines.
As someone who has chaired over two dozen vaccine safety monitoring boards for the FDA, and National Institute for Health, McCullough had room to criticize how the vaccines have been rolled out. “With this program, there is no critical event committee, there is no data-safety monitoring board, and there’s no human ethics committee. Those structures are mandatory for all large clinical investigations, and so the word that’s really used for what’s going on is malfeasance, that’s wrongdoing of people in authority,” the doctor explained. “Without any safety measures in place, you can see what’s going on,” he continued. “Basically it’s the largest application of a biological product with the greatest amount of morbidity and mortality in the history of our country.” “We are at over 5,000 deaths so far, as you know, and I think about 15,000 hospitalizations. In the EU it’s over 10,000 deaths. We are working with the Center for Medicaid (CMS) data, and we have a pretty good lead that the real number is tenfold.” McCullough explained that because the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database only amounts to about 10 percent of the bad reactions to the vaccines, his team has had to go to other sources for information. “We have now a whistleblower inside the CMS, and we have two whistleblowers in the CDC,” the doctor revealed. “We think we have 50,000 dead Americans. Fifty thousand deaths. So we actually have more deaths due to the vaccine per day than certainly the viral illness by far. It’s basically propagandized bioterrorism by injection.” Dr. McCullough said he’s seen people in his office with cases of portal vein thrombosis, myocarditis, and serious memory problems post-vaccination. “It’s so disconcerting,” he said.
“If you said this is all a Gates Foundation program to reduce the population, it’s fitting very well with that hypothesis, right? The first wave was to kill the old people by the respiratory infection, the second wave is to take the survivors and target the young people and sterilize them,” he said.
“If you notice the messaging in the country, in the United States, they’re not even interested in old people now. They want the kids. They want the kids, kids, kids, kids kids! They’re such a focus on the kids,” he said, noting that in Toronto, Canada, last month, they lured the children with promises of ice-cream to get the jab. According to one report, the government of Ontario—-which doesn’t require parental consent for children to get vaccinated—-encouraged the kids to get the Pfizer vaccine at a pop-up vaccine event. “They held the parents back, and they were vaccinating the kids,” the doctor reported. He said his Canadian wife’s mother was forcibly vaccinated against her will. McCullough predicted that the United States is gearing up to force people into getting the injections. “We have to stop it, and we have to see what’s behind it,” he concluded.
I’ve said it many times, most Americans are not comfortable with making independent decisions, especially potential life-and-death healthcare decisions posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. It is as if Americans must make a group decision, which gives rise to the term “sheeple” to describe modern-day Americans. It almost seems as if opposition to experimental vaccination is unamerican. If only the “sheeple” knew.
Decisions to vaccinate made along political lines
It appears Americans are making momentous decisions to undergo experimental vaccination, that will have a lasting positive or negative effect their lives, largely along political lines rather than cautious analysis with regard to personal safety and effectiveness.
Most of what many Americans hear or read about COVID-19 is pro-vaccine propaganda which slants virtually all of the information, leaving the lay public with a choice to pick the vaccine they would prefer rather than to deal with the question whether they should vaccinate at all, which is what informed consent is all about.
It may come as a surprise to learn that no vaccine is totally safe or effective, especially an experimental RNA or DNA vaccine that uses unproven technology.
At the risk of ruining a night’s sleep and causing high anxiety, what will the many millions of Americans who have already been vaccinated think when they learn the mortality rate for vaccinated individuals is greater than the mortal risk from the virus? (see below)
The decision to vaccinate may follow along family lines
Candidates for vaccination are likely to make their decisions to immunize as a family which may be why vaccination correlates with political party affiliation.
Many will delegate the decision to inoculate to a physician
Not understanding all of the medical jargon nor other complexities themselves, most people are expected to punt and delegate the decision to vaccinate to their trusted doctor. Surveys bear this out. However, it is difficult to find anybody in the field of healthcare who doesn’t have a conflict of interest on this issue.
News media censorship
News media censorship is another factor, making it difficult for independent-minded parties to properly assess the pros and cons of vaccination. If the COVID-19 vaccines were all that they are advertised to be, no censorship would be necessary.
The very idea of pressing for universal vaccination using vaccines that are experimental, and for which there is incomplete data on side effects, should cause vaccine candidates to delay their decision till more data is available. Especially since all the lab animals given RNA vaccines against coronaviruses succumbed to vaccine-induced side effects. The pressure by government health authorities and the news media to hurriedly vaccinate suggests some other agenda.
One of the hidden factors that could be causing health agencies to pressure patients to vaccinate could be the upcoming data on the BCG tuberculosis vaccine which in population studies has been shown to drastically reduce risk for COVID-19 infection. The first of many BCG vaccine studies is due to be reported in July of 2021. Will a vaccine that has been around since 1921 upstage the new RNA-DNA vaccines?
COVID-19 Is Not Ten Times More Fatal Than The Flu
Probably the most misleading claim is that the COVID-19 coronavirus is 10 times more deadly than the seasonal flu.
Google reports 600,000 COVID-19 related deaths among 33.4 million positive tests, of which at least 40% of cases were false positives (June 11, 2021 data). Deduct that 40% and you have ~20 million cases and 360,000 deaths over a 1.5- year period, or ~1.8% mortality rate or 18 per 1000, which is misleading.
Let’s recalculate. Flu deaths are ~0.1% (1 in 1000). But the estimated 360,000 deaths when divided by the US population of 328,000,000 is 1/10th of one-percent, about the same mortality rate as the flu.
The statistical difference between Moderna at 0.00073% infection rate and placebo at 0.00123% is just 0.0005% in hard numbers (5 out of 10,000 difference), not even 1% better than placebo, and not the advertised 0.95% effectiveness.
Furthermore, vaccine trials cannot possibly indicate whether these injections save lives. That is because mortality is not being measured. None of the trials currently under way are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome, including hospitalization or death.
For inexplicable reasons most Americans opting for immunization don’t feel misled by the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test that early-on used a different threshold to inaccurately produce seemingly high infection rates. The threshold was then lowered (from as high as 35 to 28 doubling cycles), which was changed downward as more Americans were immunized to falsely make it appear vaccines were having an impact on infection rates. The public was none the wiser.
Absurd denial RNA-DNA COVID-19 Vaccines are experimental
The denial that COVID-19 vaccines are “experimental gene therapy” is also bogus. For example, RNA vaccines (Moderna, Pfizer) by definition utilize RNA to provoke antigens (a toxin that provokes the human immune system to respond) for long-term immunity. According to a recent report, it is possible RNA can be re-written into DNA!
It is said that RNA degrades after it does its job. Specific antibodies against COVID-19 are then armed to kill off future exposure to COVID-19.
That the news media currently pans current COVID-19 vaccines as not being experimental is totally fallacious. The very application to FDA to proceed with vaccination was based upon emergency clearance for the use of new unproven vaccine technology that has never been widely tested on humans before. Emergency use vaccines are by definition experimental. Without inflated mortality numbers emergency use would have never been granted. Informed consent is required for vaccination but is being waived, which is required for all vaccines regardless of their experimental status.
What is the risk for dying from COVID-19 versus dying from the vaccine?
For Americans under age 50 the chances of dying from serious side effects induced by the vaccine are worse than dying from COVID-19 itself.
How many Americans have heard that 1,750 vaccine-related deaths occurred in the first 3 months of 2021 which has now jumped to 5,997 deaths in early June, an unprecedented number in the history of VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System). There is a backlog of reports at VAERS and these numbers will continue to skyrocket upwards.
Will current vaccines protect against new gene variants of COVID-19?
The decision to be immunized against the mutated COVID-19 coronavirus also follows typical innovator, early adaptor, late adapter, laggard adoption periods. The group most vulnerable to vaccine side effects or ineffective inoculation, the elderly, Black Americans, and those with autoimmune diseases and organ transplants, were urged to vaccinate first when they should have been the last to do so. Furthermore, why would the entire military be coerced to vaccinate before knowing long-term effects?
Most Americans are being spoon-fed false assurances the vaccines are safe and effective before long-term data is available. Some of the information potential vaccinees are using to make decisions is patently misleading or false on its face. Yet when confronted with this misinformation, at this point Americans apparently don’t feel they have been lied to or misled, as they just need some way to overcome their fears and anxiety.
What was the respiratory disease outbreak in the US in late 2019?
Among the refusers, the survey indicates they are likely to believe at least one vaccine myth (which are not myths at all). Vaccination of children inexplicably aligns with parents’ own vaccination intentions, even though their children are at almost zero risk for death from the virus.
Those who hesitate to vaccinate are more likely to believe vaccines may change your DNA (actually, they may).
In 1975, Professor Satoshi Omura at the Kitsato institute in Japan isolated an unusual Streptomyces bacterium from the soil near a golf course along the southeast coast of Honshu, Japan. Omura, along with William Campbell, found that the bacterial culture could cure mice infected with the roundworm Heligmosomoides polygyrus. Campbell isolated the active compounds from the bacterial culture, naming them “avermectins” and the bacterium S. avermitilis for the compounds’ ability to clear mice of worms.7 Despite decades of searching around the world, the Japanese microorganism remains the only source of avermectin ever found. Ivermectin, a derivative of avermectin, then proved revolutionary. Originally introduced as a veterinary drug, it soon made historic impacts in human health, improving the nutrition, general health, and well-being of billions of people worldwide ever since it was first used to treat onchocerciasis (river blindness) in humans in 1988. It proved ideal in many ways, given that it was highly effective, broad-spectrum, safe, well tolerated, and could be easily administered.7 Although it was used to treat a variety of internal nematode infections, it was most known as the essential mainstay of 2 global disease elimination campaigns that has nearly eliminated the world of two of its most disfiguring and devastating diseases. The unprecedented partnership between Merck & Co. Inc, and the Kitasato Institute combined with the aid of international health care organizations has been recognized by many experts as one of the greatest medical accomplishments of the 20th century. One example was the decision by Merck & Co to donate ivermectin doses to support the Mectizan Donation Program that then provided more than 570 million treatments in its first 20 years alone.8 Ivermectin’s impacts in controlling onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis, diseases which blighted the lives of billions of the poor and disadvantaged throughout the tropics, is why its discoverers were awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2015 and the reason for its inclusion on the World Health Organization’s (WHO) “List of Essential Medicines.” Furthermore, it has also been used to successfully overcome several other human diseases and new uses for it are continually being found.7”
Following are the section headings from Dr. Kory’s paper.
“Preclinical studies of Ivermectin’s activity against SARS-CoV-2”
“Preclinical studies of ivermectin’s anti-inflammatory properties”
“Exposure prophylaxis studies of ivermectin’s ability to prevent transmission of COVID-19”
“Clinical studies on the efficacy of ivermectin in treating mildly ill outpatients”
“Clinical studies of the efficacy of ivermectin in hospitalized patients”
“Ivermectin in post-COVID-19 syndrome”
“Epidemiological data showing impacts of widespread ivermectin use on population case counts and case fatality rates”
He then sums up this evidence in the section called “The evidence base for ivermectin against COVID-19” that I quote below, once again with reference links intact.
“To date, the efficacy of ivermectin in COVID-19 has been supported by the following:
Since 2012, multiple in vitro studies have demonstrated that Ivermectin inhibits the replication of many viruses, including influenza, Zika, Dengue, and others.9–17
Ivermectin inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication and binding to host tissue through several observed and proposed mechanisms.18
Ivermectin has potent anti-inflammatory properties with in vitro data demonstrating profound inhibition of both cytokine production and transcription of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), the most potent mediator of inflammation.37–39
Ivermectin significantly diminishes viral load and protects against organ damage in multiple animal models when infected with SARS-CoV-2 or similar coronaviruses.31,32
Ivermectin prevents transmission and development of COVID-19 disease in those exposed to infected patients.40–45
Ivermectin hastens recovery and prevents deterioration in patients with mild to moderate disease treated early after symptoms.45,49–52,61,62
Ivermectin hastens recovery and avoidance of ICU admission and death in hospitalized patients.45,51,53,63–66
Ivermectin reduces mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19.45,53,63
Ivermectin leads to temporally associated reductions in case fatality rates in regions after ivermectin distribution campaigns.48
The safety, availability, and cost of ivermectin are nearly unparalleled given its low incidence of important drug interactions along with only mild and rare side effects observed in almost 40 years of use and billions of doses administered.75
The World Health Organization has long included ivermectin on its “List of Essential Medicines.”
A summary of the statistically significant results from the above controlled trials are as follows. Note that RCT is for randomized controlled trial and OCT is for observational controlled trial.
“Controlled trials in the prophylaxis of COVID-19 (8 studies)
All 8 available controlled trial results show statistically significant reductions in transmission.
Three RCTs with large statistically significant reductions in transmission rates, N = 774 patients.44–46
Five OCTs with large statistically significant reductions in transmission rates, N = 2052 patients.40–43,47
Controlled trials in the treatment of COVID-19 (19 studies)
Five RCTs with statistically significant impacts in time to recovery or hospital length of stay.45,49,53,64,65
One RCT with a near statistically significant decrease in time to recovery, P = 0.07, N = 130.54
One RCT with a large, statistically significant reduction in the rate of deterioration or hospitalization, N = 363.49
Two RCTs with a statistically significant decrease in viral load, days of anosmia, and cough, N = 85.57,60
Three RCTs with large, statistically significant reductions in mortality (N = 695).45,60,65
One RCT with a near statistically significant reduction in mortality, P = 0.052 (N = 140).53
Three OCTs with large, statistically significant reductions in mortality (N = 1688).51,63,66”
If reading scientific literature is not your thing, watch the long form Pierre Kory interview with Bret Weinstein to have a sense of how well and in so many ways Ivermectin could end the pandemic in a matter of weeks. As a follow up, see Weinstein and his wife Heather Hying on their Darkhorse Q&A for a discussion of plotted data for Indian states that employed Ivermectin.
The last section heading in the review paper before the Discussion is called “Safety of ivermectin.” In my view the safety is obvious by the fact that it has been widely and safely used for decades. Consider this quote from a paper in the Bulletin of the World Health Organization | August 2004, 82 (8)3-571. “Adverse events associated with ivermectin were of only mild to moderate severity, and in all cases they resolved spontaneously. Abdominal discomfort, the most common adverse event, is probably caused by worms dying and disintegrating, especially Ascaris lumbricoides.”
Wait, there is more! This drug not only has been widely used and is prevalent throughout the developing world, but it is very inexpensive! Maybe 1000 times cheaper than Remdesivir.
Thus, it cannot be stated too strongly that Ivermectin may be the greatest drug ever found/discovered and this drug is almost too good to be true for treating Covid-19.Yet given this great news, what has been the response in the developed world? Crickets! But not only that, social media has actively suppressed discussion of this miraculous potential. Furthermore, as the Mint News reports (my emphasis), “In a sweeping shift in the treatment of covid-19 patients, the Union health ministry has removed usage of popular drugs such as Ivermectin, Azithromycin, Doxycycline, Zinc, Favipiravir and plasma therapy.” The questioning of Ivermectin by the same people pushing the experimental vaccines (or should I say gene therapies) is beyond the pale. The words that come to my mind are chutzpah, audacity, cheek, nerve, and gall.
What is going on? Who is behind the suppression of Ivermectin?.Many people are starting to recognize the evil descending on the world. Weinstein described it as akin to gravity, there being a great mass that we cannot see but we can feel its pull.
This is why I think Ivermectin might provide another miracle. With its incredible pedigree anyone who is confronted with the fact of its existence and the evidence compiled by Dr. Kory with the total black out of news will immediately be red pilled. Thus, the more people know thi story the more demands there will be to determine who/why Ivermectin has been suppressed. This would truly be a miracle and the answer to my own prayers. So please, spread the word Ivermectin to anyone who will listen. This could be the biggest story of our lifetime.
The rich man is wise in his own eyes, but the poor who has understanding sees through him (Prov.28:11).
It’s been astonishing to watch something I’ve never seen before: the use of medical propaganda to mislead whole nations, possibly even much of the world. Governments, particularly those with a Welfare State mentality, have been duped by a host of medical bureaucrats who want us to believe they care for us.
I’m not convinced they do. They definitely care about themselves, their career and their longevity in their positions. That’s the way of all bureaucrats. The common person had better understand that his interests and his health, have never been the concern of bureaucrats, at least, not in my lifetime. Mises wrote a book on this in 1944.
The U.S. Cardiologist Doctor Peter McCullough has been quite forthright on this subject. His attitude is that there really has been a Covid Conspiracy, working against the public. He’s figured out low-cost ways of dealing with the coronavirus, but has had to work against systemic opposition within the medical establishment, even though he was successful in treating large numbers of patients.
He writes that
What we have learned over time is that we could no longer communicate with government agencies. We actually couldn’t communicate with our propagandized colleagues in major medical centers, all of which appear to be under a spell, almost as if they’ve been hypnotized.
Whatever could be the goal of all of this? He explains:
What we have discovered is that the suppression of early treatment was tightly linked to the development of a vaccine, and the entire program—and in a sense, bioterrorism phase one— was rolled out, and was really about keeping the population in fear, and in isolation preparing them to accept the vaccine, which appears to be phase two of a bioterrorism operation.
This means that we have to recalibrate. We have to think about what is being claimed and foisted upon us by political leaders and bureaucrats, and consider the whole matter, independently.
All of the controls, the lockdowns, the fear campaigns, and pressure to vaccinate immediately, have been with a view to manipulating a trusting, vulnerable population to be vaccinated.
But guess what? We saw a headline recently:
4,000 Vaccinated people in Massachusetts test Positive to the Virus
McCullough concluded that
Basically it’s the largest application of a biological product with the greatest amount of morbidity and mortality in the history of our country.
People who think it’s the job of their government to keep them safe, place themselves in a perilous position. Governments don’t know how to keep people safe, and never have. My safety is best left with me, and those immediately around me, because
Where responsibility rests, authority lies.
If I think it’s a good idea that the government should try to keep me safe, I’ve committed myself into their hands, and they will accept that responsibility, gladly.
But, I’d rather look after myself. Why? It’ll be safer, cheaper, and much more reliable.
When the Welfare State accepted responsibility for the Education, Health and Welfare of its citizens, two things happened. First, the costs to the citizen escalated dramatically. And second, the quality of the provision dropped, just as dramatically.
Civil government is not a parent, caring for a child. But, it is an institution with power, and it will use it, gladly. It was the governing Committee of Public Safety that was responsible for the slaughter of 35,000 to 40,000 innocent individuals, during the French Revolution. Isn’t there a faint irony, in that?
Angela Codevilla recently pointed out that:
In fact, the bureaucracy’s, the intelligence agencies’, the armed forces’ actions against republicans are not errors. They are the oligarchic regime’s acts of war. As the majority of Americans grasp that reality, they deprive the regime’s powers of the legitimacy that gives them force.
If we want to make any progress out of this dreadful Coronavirus hole, it will begin in our hearts and minds, and our expectations of government being very sharply reduced. For, as Mises wrote
Government interference always means either violent action or the threat of such action…. Government is in the last resort the employment of armed men, of policemen, gendarmes, soldiers, prison guards, and hangmen. The essential feature of government is the enforcement of its decrees by beating, killing, and imprisoning. Those who are asking for more government interference are asking ultimately for more compulsion and less freedom.
 Angelo Codevilla, “Restoring America Requires Dedicated Citizens to Re-found our Republic,” 22/6/2021.
 Ludwig von Mises, “Omnipotent Government,” 1944.
In a public comment to the CDC, molecular biologist and toxicologist Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay, Ph.D., called to immediately halt Covid vaccine production and distribution. Citing fertility, blood-clotting concerns (coagulopathy), and immune escape, Dr. Lindsay explained to the committee the scientific evidence showing that the coronavirus vaccines are not safe.
On April 23, 2021, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices held a meeting in Atlanta, Georgia. The focus of this ACIP meeting was blood clotting disorders following Covid vaccines. Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay spoke to the CDC during the time set aside for public comment.
You can listen to her testimony on YouTube here (for now, anyway. If this link goes viral, YouTube will likely censor it).
Molecular Biologist and Toxicologist Calls to Halt Covid Vaccine
Hi, my name is Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay. I hold a doctorate in biochemistry and molecular biology from the University of Texas, and have over 30 years of scientific experience, primarily in toxicology and mechanistic biology.
In the mid-1990s, I aided the development of a temporary human contraceptive vaccine which ended up causing unintended autoimmune ovarian destruction and sterility in animal test models. Despite efforts against this and sequence analyses that did not predict this.
I strongly feel that all the gene therapy vaccines must be halted immediately due to safety concerns on several fronts.
Janci Chunn Lindsay: Covid vaccines could induce cross-reactive antibodies to syncytin, and impair fertility as well as pregnancy outcomes
First, there is a credible reason to believe that the Covid vaccines will cross-react with the syncytin and reproductive proteins in sperm, ova, and placenta, leading to impaired fertility and impaired reproductive and gestational outcomes.
Respected virologist Dr. Bill Gallaher, Ph.D., made excellent arguments as to why you would expect cross reaction. Due to beta sheet conformation similarities between spike proteins and syncytin-1 and syncytin-2.
I have yet to see a single immunological study which disproves this. Despite the fact that it would literally take the manufacturers a single day to do these syncytin studies to ascertain this [once they had serum from vaccinated individuals]. It’s been over a year since the assertions were first made that this [the body attacking its own syncytin proteins due to similarity in spike protein structure] could occur.
Pregnancy losses reported to VAERS lead to demand to halt Covid vaccine
We have seen 100 pregnancy losses reported in VAERS as of April 9th. And there have [also] been reports of impaired spermatogenesis and placental findings from both the natural infection, vaccinated, and syncytin knockout animal models that have similar placental pathology, implicating a syncytin-mediated role in these outcomes.
Additionally, we have heard of multiple reports of menses irregularities in those vaccinated. These must be investigated.
We simply cannot put these [vaccines] in our children who are at .002% risk for Covid mortality, if infected, or any more of the child-bearing age population without thoroughly investigating this matter.
[If we do], we could potentially sterilize an entire generation. Speculation that this will not occur and a few anecdotal reports of pregnancies within the trial are not sufficient proof that this is not impacting on a population-wide scale.
Covid vaccine causes blood disorders
Secondly, all of the gene therapies [Covid vaccines] are causing coagulopathy. [Coagulopathy when the body’s blood clotting system is impaired.] This is not isolated to one manufacturer. And this is not isolated to one age group.
As we are seeing coagulopathy deaths in healthy young adults with no secondary comorbidities.
There have been 795 reports related to blood clotting disorders as of April 9th in the VAERS reporting system, 338 of these being due to thrombocytopenia.
There are forward and backward mechanistic principles for why this is happening. The natural infection is known to cause coagulopathy due to the spike protein. All gene therapy vaccines direct the body to make the spike protein. Zhang et al in [a scientific paper published in the Journal of Hematology & Oncology] in September 2020 showed that if you infuse spike protein into mice that have humanized ACE-2 receptors on blood platelets that you also get disseminated thrombosis.
Spike protein incubated with human blood in vitro also caused blood clot development which was resistant to fibrinolysis. [Fibrinolysis is the body’s process of breaking down blood clots]. The spike protein is causing thrombocytic events, which cannot be resolved through natural means. And all vaccines must be halted in the hope that they can be reformulated to guard against this adverse effect.
Third, there is strong evidence for immune escape—
At this point in her oral testimony, Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay was interrupted by a man’s voice: “Thank you for your comment, your time has expired.”
I reached out to Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay to find out what else she had wanted to share with ACIP, in addition to her concerns over fertility and blood-clotting disorders. She sent me back her third point, which she submitted as written testimony.
Third, there is strong evidence for immune escape, and that inoculation under pandemic pressure with these leaky vaccines is driving the creation of more lethal mutants that are both newly infecting a younger age demographic, and causing more Covid-related deaths across the population than would have occurred without intervention. That is, there is evidence that the vaccines are making the pandemic worse.
It is clear that we are seeing a temporal immune depression immediately following the inoculations [see World Meter Global Covid deaths counts following inoculation dates] and there are immunosuppressive regions on spike proteins, as well as Syn-2, that could be likely causing this, through a T-cell mediated mechanism. If we do not stop this vaccine campaign until these issues can be investigated, we may see a phenomenon such as we see in chickens with Marek’s disease.
We have enough evidence now to see a clear correlation with increased Covid deaths and the vaccine campaigns. This is not a coincidence. It is an unfortunate unintended effect of the vaccines. We simply must not turn a blind eye and pretend this is not occurring. We must halt all Covid vaccine administration immediately, before we create a true pandemic that we cannot reign in.
MIT scientist also concerned about blood-clotting, fertility issues
Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., an expert in protein synthesis, believes that Dr. Lindsay’s hypothesis is correct. “I absolutely share these concerns,” Dr. Seneff, who is a senior research scientist at MIT, wrote to me in a sobering email.
“The potential for blood clotting disorders and the potential for sterilization are only part of the story. There are other potential long-term effects of these vaccines as well, such as autoimmune disease and immune escape, whereby the vaccines administered to immune-compromised people accelerate the mutation rate of the virus so as to render both naturally acquired and vaccine-induced antibodies no longer effective.”
Like Dr. Lindsay, Dr. Seneff believes we need to immediately halt Covid vaccine campaigns. “This massive clinical trial on the general population could have devastating and irreversible effects on a huge number of people,” Seneff explains.
Jennifer Margulis, Ph.D., is an investigative journalist, book author, and Fulbright awardee. She is the author of Your Baby, Your Way: Taking Charge of Your Pregnancy, Childbirth, and Parenting Decisions for a Happier, Healthier Family, co-author (with Paul Thomas, M.D.) of The Vaccine-Friendly Plan, and The Addiction Spectrum: A Compassionate, Holistic Approach to Recovery. Follow her on Facebook, Twitter, and Pinterest.
“The only thing we have to fear is fear itself-nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance” Franklin Delano Roosevelt Inaugural Address
“Hell is empty, and all the devils are here.” William Shakespeare, The Tempest
We have now clocked 14 months and counting since the “temporary emergency” (two words that send chills up any libertarian spine) lockdown orders to prevent our nation’s hospitals from being unduly stressed by the Covid 19 virus. Without denying Covid’s transmissibility or infectiousness, especially for the elderly and at risk individuals with one or more co-morbidities, I think we can all agree that we have careened from fear to fear over this period of time. Fear over hospitalizations gave way to fear over the infamous death counts displayed 24/7 by mainstream media.
As death rates subsided last summer, fear of death gave way to fear over cases accompanied by an almost manic counting of tests administered. And, finally, the obsession with test and case counts has been displaced by how many have gotten their Covid shots. Fear, as FDR intoned in his famous inaugural address, is often unreasoning and unjustified. It elevates the flight or fight syndrome, causes the suspension of disbelief and leads to emotional, panic-driven decisions.
At each of these four stages of Covid engendered fear, one could have raised objective counters to the prevailing narrative. To wit, very few hospitals were overcrowded. Most Covid deaths, by the CDC’s own admission are with Covid not from Covid with the latter constituting 6% of the total reported. The case counts were likely drastically overinflated as a result of faulty and overly sensitive testing methodologies. And the vaccines may not be a magical cure all preventing transmission or infection, but, if safe and effective, may minimize adverse symptoms should one contract Covid. Big pharma is already mentioning the need for annual booster shots.
Raising any of these counterpoints to the prevailing narrative is unlikely to be countered by rational, calm debate, but most assuredly will get one tagged as being a Trumpian anti-vaxxer, classic ad hominem attacks hardly deserving response. But, to set the record straight, this writer is neither a Trumpian nor an anti-vaxxer. Over time my philosophic journey has evolved from an initial belief that government was a necessary evil to thinking that is mainly evil. Few politicians are for me exemplars of moral courage or intellectual honesty. President Kennedy is one exception in my lifetime as his moral courage to avert nuclear war and dismantle the national security state very well may have cost him his life at the hands of political enemies.
Before Kennedy, I have to retreat to Grover Cleveland, who had the courage time after time to uphold the Constitution, earning him the sobriquet of Mr. Veto for his repeated nays to Congressional attempts to create powers not enumerated. And saying that I am anti-vaxxer is a pejorative slight implying that I substitute superstition for medicine and science when in fact, like many, I am trying to make my own informed decision about my own health and treatment or prophylactic options.
Someone recently asked me about the origins of my love of individual liberty and how I came to embrace the non-aggression axiom at the heart of libertarian philosophy. I initially responded that after college, I followed Mark Twain’s advice never to let my schooling interfere with my education so I embarked on my own course of self-education, devouring all the classics by Rand, Rothbard, Hayek, Block, Hoppe, von Mises as well as political philosophers diametrically opposed to their love of liberty and individual responsibility. But, upon further reflection, I realized that my libertarian roots may have been present as a toddler. One of my earliest memories is my parents growing frustrated with my endless use of the word why! I guess I simply never liked being told what to do or what to think, and I think this skeptical predisposition to question authority was the fertile soil for building my set of political and moral beliefs.
So, in the spirit of being the why (and hopefully wise) guy, I have just a few questions I would like to pose to the CDC and the vaccine manufacturers before I dutifully line up to take the shots. If they can answer these fully to my satisfaction, my consent to get the shots will be informed and voluntary; if not, my submission will only occur because legal mandates will make it impossible to enjoy life on acceptable terms.
Here is my list:
Why is the partnership of government and 4 major vaccine manufacturers exempt from the usual harms of crony capitalism present in other industries where government and big business are allied? Bailouts and subsidies in other industries create moral hazard, socialize risk, and tend to result in high prices and/or poor product quality as the removal of market-based penalties for failure is weakened. Where many glorify Operation Warp Speed and are eager to announce Mission Accomplished much as Bush the younger did in the early days of the forever Iraq war, I have a gnawing sense of discomfort that a product is being rushed to market without full and extensive testing. The government can posture as savior. The vaccine manufacturers, who are granted legal immunity under their private/public partnership and have been provided enormous subsidies to develop the vaccines, have a pure profit opportunity with legally constrained limits on loss or reprisal. This is not meant to ascribe improper motives to either government or corporate entities as the efforts to abate the pandemic may indeed be totally humanitarian. But, zero liability and skewed risk/reward structures create incentives which leave me uneasy.
Are the vaccines safe and effective? If so, why are many government officials still recommending that the vaccinated wear mask(s), socially distance and otherwise put their lives on hold? Does not this public messaging do more to undercut the incentive to get a vaccine than any anti-vaxxer could create?
If the vaccines are so effective, how do you account for the occurrence from December 14, 2020 through last Friday of almost 120,000 adverse events in the US reported to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) including over 3500 deaths?
While these may statistically indeed be a small percentage of total vaccines administered to date, is it likely that the systematic underreporting to you under VAERS is on the order of just one to ten percent of all adverse events? If that is so, then do you consider the likely true number of adverse vaccine events of 1.2 to 12 million to be material?
And, for certain segments of the population (namely anyone under the age of 30) for whom the odds of contracting Covid and/or debilitating symptoms may be close to zero, how do you justify taking an injection which is admittedly still experimental? Is this risk/reward logical?
If the “vaccines” are so desirable, why have you resorted to classic propaganda techniques (including frequent public servant announcements, photo ops of athletes, politicians and movie stars getting their shots, nonstop social messaging) to encourage their acceptance? Do you think the average citizen is too infantile to provide informed consent?
Why are you threatening the use of vaccine passports and a legal nether world of the unvaccinated to coerce getting the shots? Do you think the average citizen is too infantile to provide informed consent?
Do you think that employers and colleges mandating these vaccines at your behest is consonant with the key elements of the Nuremberg Code and its strictures regarding the scope of and moral underpinnings of medical experimentation?
Why have dissenting views by other scientists and/or vaccine safety organizations been greeted with silence and/or censorship?
I look forward to receiving complete answers to my list of questions. In the meantime, I fully recognize and respect the decision of any individual who chooses to mask up, isolate from society and get vaccinated. It is your right and prerogative. Your body is your choice. I do not respect or recognize your ability to mandate that my individual health decisions are subject to your dictates, which, by and large, I find inhuman, inhumane and unconstitutional. I search in vain for a pandemic exception to the Bill of Rights, which were adopted with a devastating smallpox scourge in the founders’ rear view mirror. To compel that I abide by your dictates so that we can all get back a way of life that was unnaturally and unconstitutionally obliterated strikes me as morally obtuse.
The unique symptoms emanating from COVID-19, unlike any other coronavirus, speaks legions for this virus as a man-made weapon, or is it just a coronavirus pandemic made worse by modern medicines reluctance to adopt nutritional medicine?
Calling reported blood clots among hospitalized COVID-19 patients “a mystery,” an anxiety-raising report in Nature Magazine says blood clots arise in 20-30% of critically ill COVID-19 patients, blood thinners don’t reliably prevent these clots, and many hospitalized patients exhibit elevated levels of a protein fragment called D-dimer produced when clots dissolve, which is a “powerful predictor of mortality.”
A puzzling part of this problem is that blood platelet counts were normal. Increased fragments of clots (D-dimer) were observed only among patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Placing patients on heparin blood thinner prophylactically sometimes prevents the problem. But to add to the confusion, heparin did not significantly reduce D-dimer levels.
Another unnerving report published in E Clinical Medicine notes that 31% of COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit have blood clots in their veins, but also 20% of non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients also were found to have venous clots.
But maybe these cases of unexplained blood clotting that arise spontaneously are actually what is called pseudo-thrombotic microangiopathy, a recognized disorder that emanates from a vitamin B12 deficiency (often misdiagnosed as thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura). Purpura refers to purplish bruises on the skin or in the mouth.
Sally M. Pacholok RN, BSN and emergency room nurse, and author of , says a B12 deficiency “may unknowingly increase the death rate of this pandemic, especially in older adults.”
She says the consequences can be fatal. A shortage of B12 may hamper the ability to produce antibodies. She says 1 in 6 Americans are deficient.
A consequence of B12 deficiency is elevation of homocysteine, an undesirable blood protein that causes inflammation. Elevated homocysteine is associated with progression of lung disease among COVID-19 patients.
A B9 deficiency (folate, folic acid) may mask a B12 deficiency. A deficiency of B9 also raises homocysteine levels.
Other Ways B12 Inhibits COVID-19
Vitamin B12 is needed to inhibit polymerase, the enzyme that facilitates replication of the COVID-19 virus, which can reduce the severity of the infection.
Unreliable B12 Tests
Normal blood levels of vitamin B12 does not mean there is no vitamin B12 deficiency. So-called normal B12 blood levels are simply what is the “normal range” for the masses. But normal means normally occurring range, not healthy range. Many people with a normal blood level of B12 report improvements in sleep, fatigue, and disappearance of other symptoms with B12 supplementation.
B12 deficiency symptoms
B12 deficiency symptoms look like a list of COVID-19 symptoms: extreme fatigue, shortness of breath, rapid heart rate, numbness, tingling, or burning in either the hands, legs, or feet, and developing ulcers or sores in the mouth. Add short-term memory loss, sore tongue, backache, cough.
The methylcobalamin form of B12 is preferred. Cyanocobalamin (with a cyanide component) is sold in retail stores.
Sublingual (under the tongue) B12 is the most efficient way to take oral B12 due to the fact stomach acid needed to absorb B12 is lacking.
Other Dietary supplements
The relationship between immunity and nutrition is well known and its role in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is also being given great attention.
A report published in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases reveals vitamin and mineral levels of hospitalized COVID-19 patients: 76% of the patients were vitamin D deficient and 42% were selenium deficient. Among patients with respiratory distress, 11 (91.7%) were deficient in at least one nutrient. Selenium facilitates the availability of zinc that is required to produce T-cells and also halts viral mutations.
A natural molecule that deserves special attention is the herbal extract resveratrol, a red wine molecule known for its anti-clotting properties. A recent report says: “By virtue of its anti-thrombotic and anti-inflammatory properties, resveratrol would be expected to lower COVID-19-associated mortality, which is well known to be increased by thrombosis and inflammation.”
Steep Price To Pay
One study reveals 52.7% of COVID-19 patients are malnourished. This is a massive oversight of modern medicine.
COVID-19 patients are paying a steep price for modern medicine’s despisal and disdain for vitamin therapy. After decades of casting a blind eye at vitamin therapy, can vitamin therapy be ignored any longer?
Vaccine makers have reportedly signed a pledge to ensure safety and effectiveness of their shots before seeking government approval “to roll them out on a mass scale,” a report in The Wall Street Journal claims. Yet these experimental vaccines have already been rolled out to millions of people and the current studies aren’t even testing for safety or efficacy.
A troubling thought is that the other seven varieties of coronaviruses do not produce these deadly symptoms. Coronavirus are known as common cold viruses
It was reported in 2015 there were “gain of function” experiments conducted under the auspices of the National Institutes of Health. Those experiments increased the virility and transmission of the man-made mutated virus. The conclusion of that study said: “we synthetically re-derived an infectious full-length SHC014 recombinant virus and demonstrate robust viral replication both in vitro and in vivo. Our work suggests a potential risk of SARS-CoV re-emergence from viruses currently circulating in bat populations.”
Be on the alert, stand firm in the faith, act like men, be strong (I Cor.16:13).
Evil people really enjoy the prospect of political power. Why? It gives them opportunities to do the things they love to do, but couldn’t do before.
Right from the start, I’ve been suspicious and deeply sceptical, when this supposed crisis hit the news. I’ve found appalling, how governments throughout the West have been prepared, on the basis of a “pandemic,” to abandon the traditional rights and freedoms we’ve enjoyed, as if they were of no consequence. The freedom to travel, even within nations has sometimes been abandoned, so that people wanting for personal, business or other reasons, couldn’t travel, and now have to remain for a fortnight in “Quarantine,” in case they could be infected.
This is new. We accept the fact that infectious diseases may require those infected to undergo quarantine, and this in fact is Biblical (see Lev.13 and 14). What isn’t Biblical, is to compel this to take place, purely on an assumption that people could be infected. This directly affects the actions of free, law abiding people, going about their business, whatever that might be. These people have had to undergo all manner of injustices, based on a possibility, an assumption. It’s a new form of authoritarianism, and it’s evil.
A friend of mine in Toowoomba, Qld lost his wife in March last year. A funeral and burial? Out of the question: illegal.
For what? The assumption that because of Covid 19, a public funeral could be a dangerous risk to Public Health.
Governments prey upon the trust of their unsuspecting populace, to do what they wish. Sometimes, they utilize deception to do so.
We were told by the Americans, that Iraq had these Weapons of Mass Destruction, that they’d prepared for some dreadful activity. We were shown photographs from satellites that “showed” all these weapons lying around somewhere in Iraq, ready to be deployed.
That didn’t sound good. It proved to be a good enough excuse for the US to commence an invasion of Iraq, while they continued to pursue their investigations of all these supposed WMD’s, just lying around in plain sight.
There never were any WMD’s, but it made a good and compelling story. The US got what it wanted: a war with the flimsiest of excuses, and that was enough. A half a million Iraqi children die, after the Baghdad water supply is destroyed by U.S. bombing, a trillion dollars is spent, and what do we have?
Iraq in chaos, a number of weapons suppliers to the US military who’ve made a lot of money from it, and WMD’s that never existed.
Have we learnt anything?
Some of us have. Governments lie when they think people will believe them. In my opinion, there never has been a global health crisis. There has been a manufactured, political one, to serve some people’s interests.
Do I believe there’s been a conspiracy? I don’t know the answer to that. What I do know, is that governments and their bureaucrats have been extraordinarily willing to drive bull-dozers over the lives of billions, as if there was some great crisis to be dealt with-an emergency.
There is a pattern to this, historically. WMD was no new phenomena.
Governments want to achieve something. For reasons not immediately obvious, they declare a crisis/emergency, try to control the flow of information surrounding it, pour scorn on the “conspiracy theorists,” harass and imprison them, then try to manipulate the outcome, for their own ends. That means more power to them, and of course the bureaucrats.
In the process, the community is supposed to put up with all manner of ordeals and sacrifice of money, time and inconvenience, because of this terrible “crisis.” But was it a crisis?
Slowly over time, we begin to realise that a propaganda event has been perpetuated, and we were the stoogers and the losers.
But cracks have been appearing in the narrative, regularly. Three Canadian pastors have been arrested in only a few months, on trumped up charges, claims that they were somehow in violation of the public health regulations. One of them spent a month in goal. Why would the government go after them?
A health issue?
No, an opportunity by a godless, abusive, authoritarian government to assert their authority over the church. All of these cases are heading to court, and that could be good.
John MacArthur, a Minister of Grace Church in California, numbering thousands, decided last year that he’d had enough of being controlled by the State. He and his church elders announced they’d re-start their Sunday services, in violation of the State’s lockdown edicts. Repeatedly, the State has prosecuted this church, but it’s won, and it’s kept winning. They are growing, partly because people have respected its leadership, and joined it.
Now, the cracks continue to appear, almost daily. What really happened in Wuhan, China? And what was the relationship between Tony Fauci [pronounced “Fowchi,”] (Director of the U.S. Center for Disease Control), and the Chinese lab in Wuhan? Today I saw a headline:
Did certain individuals have a vested interest in creating a “pandemic,” and who could conceivably benefit from it? And, do vaccines even work?
The cracks appearing are an answer to prayer. If people did conspire, they’ll be found out, because the truth cannot be suppressed. Now, all of this is getting exciting, every day.
AUSTIN, Texas, April 8, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — An exceedingly well-qualified physician, who was censored by YouTube last year, addressed the Texas State Senate Health and Human Service Committee last month providing thorough information on successful treatments of COVID-19, the present high-level of herd immunity from the disease, the very limited potential of “vaccines,” and the data that shows early treatment could have saved up to 85 percent of the “over 500,000 deaths in the United States.”
Dr. Peter McCullough, MD is an internist and cardiologist, along with being a professor of medicine at Texas A&M University Health Sciences Center. He is distinguished as the most published person in history in his field and an editor of two major medical journals.
McCullough explained that from the beginning of the pandemic, he refused to let his patients “languish at home with no treatment and then be hospitalized when it was too late,” which was the typical treatment protocol being discussed, promoted and offered across the west.
He thus “put together a team of doctors” to study “appropriately prescribed off-label use of conventional medicine” to treat the illness and they published their findings in the American Journal of Medicine.
“The interesting thing was, (that while) there were 50,000 papers in the peer-reviewed literature on COVID, not a single one told the doctor how to treat it,” he said. “When does that happen? I was absolutely stunned! And when this paper was published … it became … the most cited paper in basically all of medicine at that time the world.”
With the help of his daughter, Dr. McCullough recorded a YouTube video incorporating four slides from the “peer-reviewed paper published in one of the best medical journals in the world” discussing early treatments for COVID-19. The video quickly “went absolutely viral. And within about a week YouTube said ‘you violated the terms of the community’” and they pulled it down.
Due to the “near total block on any information of treatment to patients,” Sen. Bob Johnson hosted a November hearing on this important topic where McCullough was the lead witness.
With such an aggressivesuppression of information on early treatments, and the default policy in COVID-19 testing centers to not offer any such resources to those who test positive for the infection, McCullough said, “No wonder we have had 45,000 deaths in Texas. The average person in Texas thinks there’s no treatment!”
And the blackout of such vital information goes well beyond the blatant censorship of big tech companies. McCullough said, “What has gone on has been beyond belief! How many of you have turned on a local news station, or a national cable news station, and ever gotten an update on treatment at home? How many of you have ever gotten a single word about what to do when you get handed the diagnosis of COVID-19? That is a complete and total failure at every level!”—
“Let’s take the White House: How come we didn’t have a panel of doctors assigned to put all their efforts to stop these hospitalizations? Why don’t we have doctors who actually treated patients get together in a group and every week give us an update? … Why don’t we have any reports about how many patients were treated, and spared hospitalizations? … This is a complete and total travesty to have a fatal disease, and not treat it,” he said.
“So what can be done right here, right now?” McCullough proposed to the legislators. “How about tomorrow, let’s have a law that says there’s not a single (test) result given out without a treatment guide, and without a hotline of how to get into research. Let’s put a staffer on this and find out all the research available in Texas, and let’s not have a single person go home with a test result with their fatal diagnosis, sitting at home going into two weeks of despair before they succumb to hospitalization and death. It is unimaginable in America that we can have such a complete and total blind spot.”
In reference to early treatments that have been widely used outside the west with great success (with around 1 percent to 10 percent of the death rates of the first world), McCullough turned his attention to broad media suppression of information once again asking, “When was the last time you turned on the news and ever got a window to the outside world? When did you ever get an update about how the rest of the world is handling COVID? Never. What’s happened in this pandemic is the world has closed in on us.
“There’s only one doctor whose face is on TV now. One. Not a panel. (As) doctors, we always work in groups, we always have different opinions. There’s not a single media doctor on TV who’s ever treated a COVID patient. Not a single one. There’s not a single person in the White House Task Force who has ever treated a patient,” he said.
“Why don’t we do something bold. Why don’t we put together a panel of doctors that have actually treated outpatients of COVID-19, and get them together for a meeting. And why don’t we exchange ideas, and why don’t we say how we can finish the pandemic strongly.”
“Isn’t it amazing?! Think about this. Think about the complete and total blind spot (regarding home treatments),” he said.
Herd immunity and vaccination
“The calculations in Texas on herd immunity … right now with no vaccine effect (is) 80 percent,” McCullough said. “And more people are developing COVID today. They’re going to become immune (as well).”
“People who develop COVID have complete and durable immunity. And (that’s) a very important principle: complete and durable. You can’t beat natural immunity. You can’t vaccinate on top of it and make it better. There’s no scientific, clinical or safety rationale for ever vaccinating a COVID-recovered patient. There’s no rationale for ever testing a COVID-recovered patient,” he continued.
“My wife and I are COVID-recovered. Why do we go through the testing outside? There’s absolutely no rationale (for such testing).”
Given the high levels of herd immunity, McCullough said any impact from broad vaccination in preventing COVID-19 can only be minimal at best.
“There’s plenty of COVID-recovered patients. Let them forgo the vaccine and let people who are clamoring for it get it. But at 80 percent herd immunity, in the vaccine trials fewer than one percent … in the placebo actually get COVID. Fewer than one percent. The vaccine is going to have a one percent public health impact. That’s what the data says. It’s not going to save us, we’re already 80 percent herd immune,” he said.
“If we’re strategically targeted we can actually close out the pandemic very well with the vaccine,” the cardiologist stated. “But strategically targeted. (For) people under 50 who fundamentally have no health risks, there’s no scientific rationale for them to ever become vaccinated.”
Addressing the broad “misinformation” of asymptomatic transfer of COVID-19, which has supported the need for lockdowns due to the notion that the virus can be unintentionally spread by infectious, asymptomatic people, the medical professor said, “One of the mistakes I heard today as a rationale for vaccination is asymptomatic spread. And I want to be very clear about this: My opinion is there is a low degree, if any, of asymptomatic spread. Sick person gives it to sick person. The Chinese have published a study … [of] 11 million people. They tried to find [evidence of] asymptomatic spread. You can’t find it. And that’s been, you know, one of important pieces of misinformation.”
Finally, McCullough highlighted the impact of suppressing information on effective and safe early treatments during this last year. Citing two “very large” studies, he said “when doctors treat patients early who are over age 50 with medical problems, with a sequence multi-drug approach … there’s an 85 percent reduction in hospitalizations and death.”
“We have over 500,000 deaths in the United States. The preventable fraction could have been as high as 85 percent (425,000) if our pandemic response would have been laser-focused on the problem: the sick patient right in front of us,” he concluded.